Author Archives: Dan York

Whoa! Skype releases an update for the Linux version!

penguin group small

I did have to glance out my window a few moments ago and check that there were no pigs flying across the sky… I also checked my calendar to make sure it wasn’t April Fools… why?

Skype released an update for Linux!

As much as I may occasionally whine about how Skype doesn’t give the Mac OS X client enough attention (or when they do, they don’t get it right), I’ve got nothing to complain about compared to the folks living in Linux-land. If the Mac client gets “little” attention, the Linux client has appeared to receive almost “no” attention.

So it’s good news that a “Skype 2.2 Beta for Linux” is now out. From the blog post it appears that the Linux client now has:

  • Skype Access (ability to connect to WiFi hotspots using Skype credit)
  • Support for call waiting and holding
  • Improved audio/video quality in calls
  • Support for easy conference call creation (also in the Windows and Mac 5.x clients)
  • A whack of “improvements” to the user interface and functionality that sound individually like minor tweaks but together undoubtedly make it a more solid experience
  • Over 50 various bugs (big enough to be mentioned)
  • Updated support for about 20 languages

All in all it sounds like good bit of content and it’s great to see Skype giving the Linux community some love with an update. If you run Skype on Linux, you may want to head over and check it out.

P.S. Of course, looking at the comments to the post, I can see that some in the Linux community are naturally looking for more… particularly a native-64-bit build. Hopefully with Skype’s new emphasis on trying to get out more regular releases we’ll see more Linux releases (versus the “1-beta-release-a-year” schedule they have seemed to be on).

Image credit: Antarctica Bound on Flickr


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


My 3 Main Issues With Skype 5.x For The Mac – And Jim Courtney Summarizes The Skype for Mac 5 Saga

SkypelogoI had planned to write a longer blog post today summarizing so much of the recent discussion happening online about the “Skype for Mac 5” client, particularly after the recent release of “Skype for Mac 5.1”. I was planning to link to the various posts, provide context, etc., etc.

However, in one of those moments of synchronicity that happen from time to time, I woke up this morning to find that Jim Courtney published a post very much along the lines of what I was going to write:

Skype for Mac 5 – From Ecstasy to Agony

Sooooo…. read his post! 🙂

Seriously, though, do read Jim’s post because he’s done a great job bringing together the various posts in the last couple of weeks related to the Skype for Mac 5.x issues.

For my part, I use BOTH Skype 2.8 and Skype 5.1 on a daily basis… just on two different Macs. I switch back and forth between them, although Skype 2.8 running on my Voxeo laptop continues to be my primary user interface for Skype. I just run 5.1 on an iMac in my home office so that I can try to get used to it.

My biggest issues with Skype 5.x on the Mac continue to be:

  1. LACK OF MULTIPLE WINDOWS – Right now on my 2.8 client, I show about 100 chats being open in two different main windows, each with a drawer showing those chats… and then a third window showing my contacts. It’s an extremely efficient way to work… and I have found it personally incredibly difficult to move to the “one window” paradigm of Skype 5.x.

    I frequently find myself working simultaneously in two different chats… or I will be on a call with someone and simultaneously talking about what is happening in another chat right then. I need the ability to have multiple chat windows open simultaneously before I can seriously move to using Skype 5.x.

  2. CHAT SORTING – As Jaanus Kase relates, the sorting of chats in Skype 5.x is markedly different than in Skype 2.8. I mentioned this back in November in my post, “3 Interesting Omissions From the Skype 5.0 Beta for Mac OS X“. We used to have the ability to sort like this:

    Now in 5.x, as Jaanus notes, we have the time-sorted chats and the alpha-sorted “Favorites”. It’s really a huge step backwards from the flexibility we have in 2.8.

    I like manual sorting… I loved being able to prioritize chats. Particularly when I have multiple windows open, each with a separate list of chats. In one of my windows, I have the chats manually sorted so that I can just look over and see which chats have new messages. In my other window, they are sorted by date so that the most recent chats always show up on the top. It all works very well.

  3. BIZARRE DIALPAD – Again, like Jaanus, I often use Skype to call into traditional conference call systems and getting to the dialpad in Skype 5.x is just, well, strange. You have to click the button on the top… but then you can’t control the call from that window… you have to hang up the call back in the main window… and the dialpad sometimes goes away.

    It seems a very strange departure from the “one window” paradigm Skype is promoting for 5.x overall… and it’s just bizarre.

I also have issues with the window size… but that gets at least better if you use one of the various minimalist “chat styles” that are out there. There are a number of other minor UI details that bug me from time to time… but it’s mostly again this multiple window issue. If I had the ability to “undock” chats and put them into separate windows, Skype 5.x would be a whole lot more useful to me. I might even consider switching full-time. But not right now. My efficiency with Skype would be too severely impacted.

Skype has a 5.2 for the Mac apparently in the works… someone pointed out that some documents indicated it would bring ads to the Mac version (Oh, joy!). We’ll have to see what else it brings…


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Skype’s Mini-Outage On March 30 – And The Need For Greater Transparency

skypelogo.jpgYesterday Skype had another outage. This one apparently was only minor and affected people logging in to Skype or using inbound phone numbers (what we used to call “SkypeIn” numbers). It didn’t affect me at all – Skype worked fine for me.

Skype’s recovered from the outage… but what I find a bit annoying is that there seems to be no real information about what happened.

There is a brief post on the Skype Heartbeat site which says only that things are “returning to normal” but that there might still be problems with:

  • Signing in to Skype, Skype manager, the developer site, and the forums
  • Buying Skype Credit or subscriptions
  • Making calls to landlines and mobiles

But that’s it… no word that they’ve fully recovered and no information about what the issue was.

Tales From Twitter

The best guess is what we can glean from their Twitter stream:

Skypeoutageontwitter

So apparently per this tweet the outage was caused “by an ISP failure“.

On The Need For Transparency

Here we are a day later and there is complete silence from Skype’s online sites. Nothing more on Twitter. Nothing on the blogs that I could see. I poked around a bit in the Skype community forums but nothing jumped out at me.

C’mon Skype!

If you learned one thing from the last outage back in December I would have hoped it was that we all want to hear from you and more importantly want to hear details about what is happening with the service we are using.

Communication and transparency reassure us… and create loyal and happy customers.

What caused the outage? If it was with “an ISP”, why did it take out the login services? Why were SkypeIn numbers affected? Was it a single point-of-failure?

More importantly, what are you doing so that this doesn’t happen again? Are you looking at redundant connections? Or distributing functionality?

Help us, Skype… help us understand that you want our business/usage and that we should be reassured that you are making sure these outages don’t happen again.

You are a communication company – PLEASE COMMUNICATE!

Thanks!

P.S. While I didn’t experience any problems with Skype yesterday, Andy Abramson did and wrote about his issues.


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


VoiceOnTheWeb Reviews Skype’s Qik Video Connect

Want the scoop on Qik Video Connect for the iPhone and iPad? Shortly after it was released last week Jim Courtney (of VoiceOnTheWeb) and I made our usual calls to each other to try out new apps. Unfortunately, I was slammed with a brutal cold/flu sickness last week and haven’t had the cycles to write up my own thoughts on the new app… nor do I see myself doing so anytime soon. Sooo… let me point you over to Jim’s views on the subject:

Qik Video Connect: New Video Directions from Skype

I’ll add to Jim’s commentary that I did also use the free Qik Video Connect app on my iPad2. The app is not designed for the iPad – it’s just the iPhone app running on the iPad2 – but it did work perfectly fine to make and receive video calls. In the multiple calls to Jim I spoke with him from both my iPhone and iPad2.

I did not test out the live streaming due to the fact that I was quite sick and did not honestly want people to see me on video! 🙂 I’m looking forward to trying live streaming, though, at the next event I attend.

At some point I will write up some more of my thoughts, but for now, head on over and read Jim’s…


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Stuck With Old Nortel PeriPro Apps? Check Out This Migration Tool…

Did you spend a significant amount of time, money and energy building voice applications with the “Peri Producer” (a.k.a. “PeriPro”) tool formerly owned by Nortel and now by Avaya? Would you like to move away from proprietary lock-in to a standards-based platform with a clear future? Would you like to move your PeriPro app beyond simply voice and add in communication channels like SMS/text messaging, IM, mobile web and even Twitter?

If so, do check out what my colleagues within Voxeo have come out with as the “VoiceObjects Migration Manager“:

http://developers.voiceobjects.com/support-training/voiceobjects-migration-manager/

It’s a tool that helps you move those PeriPro apps over onto Voxeo VoiceObjects where they can then work with either Voxeo’s IVR platform or the IVR platforms of about 30 other vendors. My colleague Tobias Goebel put together this screencast that talks about what the migration tool can do:

There was also an hour-long webinar earlier in March where Tobias and Dan Evans discussed the tool at great length and answered many questions from attendees. You can view the webinar and/or download the slides at the jam session page at:

http://blogs.voxeo.com/jamsessions/2011/03/07/jam-session-march-10-2011-peripro-migration-too/

While PeriPro apps were the first type of app to be converted by the VoiceObjects Migration Manager, I know that the team has its eyes on several other legacy proprietary formats that they will be adding to the tool to help even more folks move over onto VoiceObjects. It’s cool stuff they are working on!


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Summary: Links to Posts on Calling Google Voice using SIP

GooglevoiceGiven that I’ll be the guest on today’s VUC call in about an hour discussing this topic, here’s a list of some of the posts involved in the recent saga around Google Voice and SIP.

On Saturday, March 5, 2011, Todd Vierling pointed out that you could call Google Voice Numbers via a SIP URI:

Unaware of Todd’s post, but seeing mention of this SIP calling in tweets from Aswath Rao and Alok Saboo, I started what became a series of posts on Monday, March 7:

wherein the service was working… then it wasn’t… then it was… etc.

At this precise moment in time, the service IS working for me, although when I just tried it took quite some time for my SIP softphone to actually start getting a ring. But the connection did work.

Also of interest, Todd Vierling put up a great post earlier on March 4 about what we really want/need for two-way Google Voice-to-SIP interconnect and what we are losing with the end of Gizmo:

I love how Todd links to the many open tickets in Google support asking for SIP support.

Additionally, Alok Saboo put up two posts with tutorials about how to configure both a Blink client and a Yate client to call into Google Voice via SIP.

The saga will of course continue… there’s obviously interest… and Google’s been silent on the whole matter so at the end of the day we really don’t know what their plans may or may not be.


UPDATE – Nov 13, 2012: The interest in Google Voice and SIP addresses seems to continue, as I noted in a post about the large number of visits still coming to the site for this series of articles.


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Join Today’s VUC Call at Noon US Eastern To Talk About Google Voice and SIP

VucWant to join a discussion about the whole issue with Google Voice and SIP? And what we might want to really have in terms of SIP interconnect with Google Voice? And, while we’re there, want to talk about the latest changes in the mobile carrier space?

If so, join the VUC conf call happening in 90 minutes at 12 noon US Eastern. Randy, the host of VUC, asked me if I would come on as the guest and I did agree. Of course, that was before I was hit with a brutal cold this week… but I’m getting better to the point where I should be able to talk fine (if a bit funny-sounding) on the call.

You can join the live call via SIP, Skype or the regular old PSTN. There is also an IRC backchannel that gets heavy usage during the call. It will be recorded so you can always listen later.


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Microsoft Infographic on Mobile Market Shows Compelling Numbers

Everybody loves an infographic, right? Earlier today Mashable ran a Microsoft infographic about the state of the mobile market. The numbers are quite powerful (click the image to see the full version):

Mobileinfographic

I had a huge personal disconnect with one of the stats showing that so many people use their mobile phones for games, simply because I almost never use my phone that way…

Microsoftinfographic

Yet I know that many people do and I see that when I’m out and about.

All in all some interesting stats, even if they do have the inevitable promotion of Microsoft Tags, since that was the sponsor of the infographic. (Microsoft Tags being their proprietary mobile tag solution versus the QR codes you see in many places.) Not a bad technique for Microsoft really… create a great infographic with lots of compelling data… and then insert a few little tidbits and links that promote your story.. and then…

… people like me will write about it. 🙂

Regardless, there are some good stats there… kudos to the MS team who put it together.


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Skype Releases 5.1 for Mac OSX – Mostly Fixes

Skype51macFor those Mac users brave enough to step into the world of Skype 5.0 (or who inadvertently accepted the upgrade box that popped up), Skype has come out with Skype 5.1 for Mac OS X today. As Beom Soo Park notes on the Skype Garage blog, this release contains:

  • Focus on active speakers in group calls
  • Dial recently called numbers from dial pad
  • Contact groups shown in on the right hand side, allowing more space in the side bar
  • Call Quality Feedback
  • Several minor bug fixes

All of it pretty much pointing it to being the minor “dot release” that it is. The Mac release notes have also been updated with the same information.

I will say that the removal of the Contact groups from the left sidebar is a huge benefit to me. The result is a MUCH more compact sidebar:

Skype

The contact groups have now been moved over to the top of the right window area (the “main” section), which works nicely.

Unfortunately once I clicked on a group, I could find no way to return to the full set of contacts (and I’ve raised a bug ticket with Skype on this).

UPDATE – 3/25/11: It turns out that to return to the full list of contacts, you simply have to click on the “group” named “Skype.” My response in the ticket was that this is NOT intuitive (consider, for example, that I might have a group myself named “Skype”), but it is apparently how they have set it up.

The “Focus on active speakers in group calls” sounds like a useful feature/fix… but I don’t honestly find myself using Skype for all that many group calls. Still, I’m looking forward to seeing this in action at some point.

In any event, those of you using Skype 5.x on the Mac can upgrade now… or will soon see an update notice.

P.S. Find anything else of value in the release?


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Combined Coverage Map: AT&T and T-Mobile – Montana is Still A Blank Spot

Want to know what the combined coverage of AT&T and T-Mobile would look like on a map? By way of a tweet from Todd Carothers I learned of a post at Fierce Mobile Content that uses maps from AmericanRoamer.com to show what the combined coverage map of the United States would look like. Click on the link or image to see all the various comparison maps:

Att tmobile

Interesting to see the spectrum holdings of the two companies as well.

Alas, my little pocket of southwestern New Hampshire doesn’t stand to gain much out the merger… we’re still stuck with the limited AT&T coverage we have. At least, though, we’re not up in Montana, where it would appear coverage is close to nonexistent… (and yes, I know that population is minimal up there, too).

Interesting charts…


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either: