Author Archives: Dan York

Awesome Comic -> The Bright Side to the Blackberry Outage

A truly awesome way to start my Monday… courtesy of RWW, this great cartoon from Rob Cottingham showing the “bright side” of the Blackberry outage:

Noisetosignal

Of course, we iPhone owners could have a similar discovery… although whether or not our phone connection would actually work is a different question… (but did any of us truly get an iPhone for the phone piece? 😉

Great comic, Rob!


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


It’s Official! For Better Or Worse, Skype Is Now Part of Microsoft

Skype microsoft

And so begins the next chapter of Skype… first it was a scruffy little startup taking on the telecom world… then it became somewhat bizarrely part of eBay… then it went back to a private company owned primarily by Silver Lake Partners… and then… to the utter amazement of so many of us… Skype announced it would be acquired by Microsoft!

And today that acquisition is official. Microsoft announced in a news release and Skype announced in a blog post and video from CEO Tony Bates that the acquisition has formally been concluded.

The deal is done. Skype CEO Tony Bates is now the president of the Skype Dvision within Microsoft reporting directly to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer. I found this phrase of the news release to be interesting (my emphasis added):

Microsoft and Skype will remain focused on their shared goal of connecting all people across all devices and accelerating both companies’ efforts to transform real-time communications for consumers and enterprise customers.

My interest was not only in the “across all devices”, which has been a large part of Skype’s goal for some time… but also in the use of “real-time communications”. For a while that was a phrase that only the more technical-minded folks used, but now increasingly “real-time communications” seems to be the phrase of choice for many. I, for one, applaud the usage.

Skype and Microsoft also apparently wanted to be hype-compliant and so they released an infographic with recent stats about Skype. (Everyone seems to need to have an infographic these days, don’t they?)

I admit to a degree of sadness that Skype is no longer the independent company that they were. They were always “fun” as a company because they were such the “outsider” that attacked the entrenched telecommunications industry – and succeeded in so massively disrupting the industry!

They’ve been fun to watch… and a constant source of stories to write about for those of us chronicling the changing communication industry. Somehow I don’t think they’ll be quite as “fun” or “wacky” as part of such a megalithic company as Microsoft.

Yet maybe that’s okay.

Skype’s reached a point in its growth where it has disrupted so much of telecom… and it has in fact become a critical communication tool for so many.

On one level they will now have the large-scale support they need, both from a financial point-of-view but also from a “systems” point-of-view. Microsoft does understand the needs of enterprise customers. I would think they will improve the support options… and improve the security reporting features.

Heck, maybe they’ll actually put a phone number on Skype’s website so that people will stop calling ME! (People still do… had two calls last week.)

More than that, though, Microsoft will give Skype a platform upon which to move into the enterprise. Not only in the potential integration with Microsoft Lync, but just in the “legitimacy” brought about by being part of “Microsoft“. Skype is no longer some scrappy little outlaw-or-barely-legal company from somewhere in Eastern Europe who should be dismissed and blocked by IT departments everywhere.

Skype is now a Microsoft product. (with the associated microsoft.com product pages)

Enterprise IT departments understand, support and use Microsoft products… and so Skype may no longer be as dismissed and blocked as it has been. We’ll have to see… but the name does help Skype overcome some of those issues.

Microsoft also has its wide array of other products and services… Lync, XBox, Office, Office 365, etc. So many places where Skype could be further integrated.

It will be intriguing to see where the “Skype Division of Microsoft” goes now. I’m pleased for my friends there that the acquisition has closed so that they have at least some degree of certainty of what is happening next. Kudos to all involved in making the acquisition a reality.

Now let’s see what happens in the next chapter of the story of Skype…


UPDATE: Jim Courtney has a good post up, too: Microsoft Acquires Skype: Deal Closed!


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Survey: Only 40% of Canadians Password-Protect Their Cell Phones

GlobeandmailOnly 40% of Canadian cell phone users password-protect their phones or use other privacy options, a survey by Canada’s privacy commissioner found. The results of the 2000-person survey were released in August and written up in a Globe And Mail piece entitled “How private is that text message?“.

When I saw the headline, I honestly thought it was going to be something about the security of SMS messages… but in fact it was about the security of the cell phones themselves. If the phones aren’t secured then someone can go in and look at your text messages. Ergo… the link-bait title of the article. (And yes, it got me to look.)

Still, it had some interesting data points such as the fact that the users from age 18 to 34 were the ones most likely to use privacy tools, which is good to see, since they are probably the ones pumping the most information out online.

Nice to see, too, that 82 percent did not think police should have access to your online usage info without a warrant.

I was surprised, in all honestly, about the 40% number… I actually might have thought of it being lower as I know MANY people who don’t password-protect their phones mostly because of the “inconvenience” of having to enter the password to get into the phone.

And in truth the % who password-protect their phones may be lower… the article says that “only four in 10 people password-protect their phones or adjust privacy settings on personal-information sharing via downloaded applications“. The number of people who adjust privacy settings – but don’t password-protect their phone – may be driving that % up.

I wonder what a survey like this might find in the United States?

Do you password-protect your phone? (I do)


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Voxeo Customer Summit 2011, “Unlocked and Loaded”, Launches Tonight!

Tonight I’ll be thinking of all my friends and former colleagues at Voxeo as they launch the Voxeo Customer Summit 2011 at the JW Marriott Grande Lakes hotel in Orlando. With the great theme of “Unlocked and Loaded“, they have an incredibly packed agenda that will make it truly an outstanding event. Lots of great technical talks mixed in with business talks… some voice biometrics… product announcements… plus a great party and other activities!

Plus the ever geeky and wacky Chris Pirillo as show emcee and Joseph Jaffe providing the keynote talk… it should be a great time for all!

While I’m no longer a Voxeon, I’ll be thinking of the crew there and wishing them all the best. It’s a big event and will really help the people who attend to learn so much more about building communication applications using Voxeo’s platforms and services. Cool stuff!


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


EU Gives Okay To Microsoft Acquisition of Skype

skypelogo-shadow.pngTo I think no one’s real surprise, the European Union today gave the go-ahead to Microsoft’s acquisition of Skype. Given that the US Federal Trade Commission okayed the deal back in June, there should be no further barriers to the deal. Microsoft issued a very short statement:

We’re pleased that the European Commission has approved Microsoft’s acquisition of Skype. This is an important milestone, as we’ve now received clearance from both the United States and the European Union. We look forward to completing soon the final steps needed to close the acquisition, bringing together the employees of Microsoft and Skype, and creating new opportunities for people to communicate and collaborate around the world.

Jim Courtney took a look at the actual text of the EU ruling and in his post dissects how the commission viewed the consumer versus enterprise space with regard to competion – and how it reached the conclusion that it would be okay for Microsoft to acquire Skype.

For the sake of my friends working at Skype who have been hanging in an uncomfortable limbo while all this gets sorted out, I do hope that the acquisition can now proceed quickly. As Mary-Jo Foley notes, Microsoft has already been working on how Skype fits into the larger world of Microsoft, so hopefully we’ll start seeing those actions start moving ahead soon.


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


NoJitter.com Launches New Design, Better Interaction

Nojitter2011

Kudos to my friend Eric Krapf and his whole team for the redesign of one of my favorite sites for VoIP and Unified Communications news:

http://www.nojitter.com/

Way back in late 2007, Eric started as the “lead blogger” for NoJitter as the long-standing Business Communications Review (BCR) magazine shut down its print operation and decided to forge a new direction in the online world.

It’s been great to see the growth of NoJitter over these past four years, and it’s been great to see so many of my friends within the industry writing there.

With this new redesign, Eric mentions many of the new features, but the one I look forward to seeing most is the better commenting system. That was one major drawback of the previous site… hopefully this one works much better.

All in all I quite like the new look and congratulate Eric and the whole team there on the re-launch!


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Speaking Next Week on IPv6 and VoIP Security at 7th Real-Time Communications Conference in Chicago

Rtcconf2011

If any of you will be in Chicago next week, October 4-6, 2011, for the 7th Annual Real-Time Communications Conference & Expo, I’ll be there on the 5th and 6th as a speaker.

I’ll be speaking twice. First on Wednesday the 5th at 4pm on “The Current State of VoIP Security“, wearing my VOIPSA hat and leading off a series of talks about security. I’ll be providing an overview of the main threats to VoIP and communications security in general, leading the way into the two more specific talks following mine.

I’m rather excited that my second session will be my first public appearance wearing my new Internet Society hat (if you are not aware, I’ve posted details about my recent move) and will of course be about IPv6… more specifically “How IPv6 Will Impact SIP And Telecom“.

Due to ongoing events on the personal front, I wasn’t sure that I was going to make it out there… and quite frankly there’s still a chance that I won’t… but I should be out there.

If you look at the conference schedule, the speakers include outstanding people involved with so many different aspects of real-time communications. It should be truly an excellent event!

P.S. You can still register if you would like to attend!


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


The Economist Asks: Who Should Run The Internet?

Theeconomist

Who should run the Internet? Should it continue in the “multi-stakeholder” way it has operated so far? Or should governments have more of a say in how it is run?

The Economist captures that argument in a piece out today entitled “A plaything of powerful nations” that reports on the meeting this week in Nairobi of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF). The article rather succinctly covers some of the tension and challenges around public policy issues I briefly mentioned in my recent post about joining the Internet Society.

A key point for me is this (my emphasis added):

The multi-stakeholder approach dates from the beginnings of the internet. Its founding fathers believed that more openness would be both more secure and better for innovation. What is more, since the internet is a network of independent networks, it is hard to construct a form of governance that allows anyone to dictate things from the top.

Yet as the article notes, many governments would like to try – and the power struggle is really only beginning.

There are definitely going to be some interesting times ahead…


NOTE: While I am now employed by the Internet Society, I am NOT involved with the public policy activities of the organization and all comments and viewpoints expressed here are entirely mine alone as an individual.


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either:


Did Amazon Just Fork The Android Operating System?

Kindlefire

Did Amazon just fork the Android operating system with their Kindle Fire? That’s the question asked at Mashable today in a post “Amazon Kindle Fire Just Hijacked Android where it was noted that all the promotion around the Kindle Fire did not mention Android. The key piece to me is this:

Amazon is not the first company to use Android for its devices, only to customize the UI and add its own App Store…

Still, Amazon’s customization of Android goes above and beyond re-theming the interface. Amazon has created its own apps for email, video playback (using Amazon Instant Video), music and books…

Amazon is using Android 2.3 as its base, not the tablet-specific Honeycomb, and we expect that the company has taken the opportunity to optimize 2.3 specifically for the Kindle Fire’s hardware.

Likewise, instead of applying tweaks to the basic Android web browser, Amazon chose to build its own: Amazon Silk…

The tragedy here is that the Amazon Kindle Fire will undoubtedly be a very popular device. At $199, I can see many people picking these devices up.

And it could be a great opportunity to bolster the Android ecosystem.

To encourage and nurture a further competitive marketplace for apps.

But the challenge is stated well in the Mashable piece:

We expect Amazon to start courting Android developers to make customized Kindle Fire-specific versions of their apps.

It’s not an Android device… it’s an Amazon device. And though it may use Android as a base, it has a highly customized layer on top.

Do we now have effectively yet another application ecosystem?


If you found this post interesting or useful, please consider either: